1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 766 F.Supp.2d
  5. 766 F.Supp.2d 1 (2011)
 

BLUMAN v. FEDERAL ELECTION COM'N

Civil Action No. 10-1766 (RMU).

766 F.Supp.2d 1 (2011)

Benjamin BLUMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 7, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren Postman , Jacob M. Roth , Jones Day, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Adav Noti , David Brett Kolker , Kevin Deeley , Steve Nicholas Hajjar , Federal Election Commission, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR A THREE-JUDGE COURT

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs applied to have a three-judge court review their constitutional challenge to a provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA") and its implementing regulation. The defendant, the Federal Election Commission

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases