PLANS, INC. v. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

No. CIV. S-98-266 FCD/EFB.

752 F.Supp.2d 1136 (2010)

PLANS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

November 5, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Paul Huber , Attorney at Law, Scott Michael Kendall , Law Offices of Scott M. Kendall, Elk Grove, CA, for Plaintiff.

Susan R. Denious , Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Robert J. Sullivan , Nossaman Guthner Knox and Elliott, Sacramento, CA, Frederick J. Dennehy , Wilentz Goldman and Spitzer, Woodbridge, NJ, Katherine L. Thivierge , Attorney at Law, Southgate, MI, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.

The Phase I trial of this case commenced on August 31, 2010. That same day, following the close of plaintiff PLANS, Inc.'s ("plaintiff") case-in-chief, addressing the sole issue of whether anthroposophy is a religion, defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("defendant" or "SCUSD") moved for a judgment on partial findings pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52(c)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases