1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 750 F.Supp.2d
  5. 750 F.Supp.2d 1004 (2010)
 

EMD CROP BIOSCIENCE INC. v. BECKER UNDERWOOD, INC.

No. 10-cv-283-bbc.

750 F.Supp.2d 1004 (2010)

EMD CROP BIOSCIENCE INC. and EMD Crop Bioscience Canada Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BECKER UNDERWOOD, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

October 29, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin E. Leace , Lauren Schmidt , Ratnerprestia, Berwyn, PA, Bryan J. Cahill , James Donald Peterson, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Madison, WI, for Plaintiffs.

Christopher J. Burrell , Elizabeth Cowan Wright , James W. Poradek , Lauren Jennifer Frank , Sean D. Solberg , Faegre & Benson LLP, Minneapolis, MN, David G. Hanson , Lisa Nester Kass , Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant.

OPINION and ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

In this case for monetary and injunctive relief, plaintiffs EMD Crop Bioscience, Inc. and EMD Crop Bioscience Canada Inc. contend that defendant Becker Underwood, Inc. is infringing plaintiffs' United States Patent No. 6,979,664 (the '664 patent) and defendant is liable for false marking of its products under 35 U.S.C. § 292. Now before the court is defendant's motion to dismiss the infringement claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases