1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 725 F.Supp.2d
  5. 725 F.Supp.2d 389 (2010)
 

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUT CORP. v. SATELLITE DONUTS

No. 10 Civ. 4272(LAK).

725 F.Supp.2d 389 (2010)

KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUT CORPORATION, et ano., Plaintiffs, v. SATELLITE DONUTS, LLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 21, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Siegal , Jonathan Pressment, Haynes and Boone, LLP, for the Plaintiffs.

Justin M. Klein , Marks & Klein LLP, for the Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

This action arises out of the purported termination of two franchise agreements by plaintiffs Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation and Northeast Doughnuts, LLC (collectively, "Krispy Kreme"). The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants have defaulted on their obligations under the agreements and that their continued use of Krispy Kreme's trademarks is unlawful under the Lanham Act.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases