1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 725 F.Supp.2d
  5. 725 F.Supp.2d 1344 (2010)
 

SEWELL v. D'ALESSANDRO & WOODYARD, INC.

Case No. 2:07-cv-343-FtM-29SPC.

725 F.Supp.2d 1344 (2010)

Randolph SEWELL, Daphne Sewell, Moses Eshkenazi, Therese Eshkenazi, and Henriette Eshkenazi, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. D'ALESSANDRO & WOODYARD, INC., a Florida for profit corporation; Gates, D'Alessandro & Woodyard, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; K. Hovnanian First Homes, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; First Home Builders of Florida, a Florida general partnership; First Home Builders of Florida I, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Jan Baillargeon, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frank D'Alessandro, deceased; Samir Cabrera, an individual; Honora Kreitner, an individual; Bruce A. Robb, an individual; and Patrick Logue, an individual, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division.

July 20, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary C. Rosen , Daniel L. Wallach , Becker & Poliakoff, PA, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiffs.

Philip J. Snyderburn , William M. Rishoi , Snyderburn, Rishoi & Swann, Maitland, FL, Jon Douglas Parrish , Parrish, Lawhon & Yarnell, PA, Naples, FL, Raquel M. Fernandez , Cozen O'Connor , Melissa Cade Pallett-Vasquez , Robert William Turken , Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod, LLP, Miami, FL, Charles Wachter , Gianluca Morello , Wiand Guerra King , PL, Holland & Knight, LLP, Laura E. Ward , Ronald Sturgis Holliday, DLA Piper U.S., LLP, Tampa, FL, Allison S. Bernstein , Butzel Long , Barry A. Postman , S. Jonathan Vine , Cole, Scott & Kissane, PA, West Palm Beach, FL, Ronald L. Buschbom , Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans & Abel, PA, Ft. Myers, FL, Robert J. Pratte , DLA Piper U.S., LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Philip J. Snyderburn , William M. Rishoi , Snyderburn, Rishoi & Swann, Maitland, FL, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Court's sua sponte request (Doc. # 364) that the parties discuss the impact, if any, of the Supreme Court's decision in Merck & Co. Inc. v. Reynolds, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 1784, 176 L.Ed.2d 582 (2010). The parties have submitted their respective positions (Docs.# 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 361).

I...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases