1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 725 F.Supp.2d
  5. 725 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2010)
 

INTERTAPE POLYMER CORP. v. INSPIRED TECHNOLOGIES

Case No. 6:09-cv-289-Orl-31GJK.

725 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2010)

INTERTAPE POLYMER CORP., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, v. INSPIRED TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division.

July 14, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred J. Bennington, Jr. , David J. Markese , Michael L. Gore , Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Counterdefendant.

Craig S. Krummen , Tiffany A. Blofield , Winthrop & Weinstine, PA, Minneapolis, MN, Leslie Anne Moore , Law Office of Terryl Blackmon Walker, Winter Park, FL, Ruth C. Osborne , McEwan, Martinez & Dukes, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Counterclaimant.

ORDER

GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court without oral argument upon consideration of Plaintiff-Counterdefendant's, Intertape Polymer Corporation ("Intertape"), Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Motion") (Doc. 43),1 Defendant-Counterclaimant's, Inspired Technologies, Inc. ("ITI"), response in opposition thereto (Doc. 63) (the "Response"), and Intertape's reply (Doc. 66).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases