MONEX DEPOSIT CO. v. GILLIAM

Case No. SACV 09-287 JVS (RNBx).

680 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2010)

MONEX DEPOSIT CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jason GILLIAM, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 25, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Scott Andrews, Neil A Goteiner, Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Jason Gilliam, Laguna Hills, CA, pro se.

Richard Gilliam, Laguna Hills, CA, pro se.


AMENDED ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Monex Deposit Company and Monex Credit Company (collectively, "Monex") move for summary judgment and/or summary adjudication pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on its attempted extortion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claims. Defendants Richard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases