1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 714 F.Supp.2d
  5. 714 F.Supp.2d 33 (2010)
 

BREEDEN v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.

Civil Action No. 08-0625(JR).

714 F.Supp.2d 33 (2010)

Mary Kate BREEDEN, Plaintiff, v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 26, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam Augustine Carter , R. Scott Oswald , Nicholas Woodfield , Employment Law Group, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

David Moore Hernandez , Vedder Price, P.C., Washington, DC, Aaron R. Gelb , Joseph K. Mulherin , Vedder Price P.C., Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM

JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.

A jury found in favor of plaintiff Mary Kate Breeden on her claim that her former employer, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, had illegally retaliated against her for taking Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") leave. Novartis now moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) for judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the verdict.1 The motion will be granted.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases