CARRIZOSA v. STASSINOS

No. C-05-02280 RMW.

669 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2009)

Richard L. CARRIZOSA and Mary Pea, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Paul R. STASSINOS, an individual, Alan Mecham, an individual, Legal Recovery Services, Inc., a California corporation, and Does 1-20, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

March 30, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Wilcox, O. Randolph Bragg, Paul Arons, for Plaintiff.

Andrew M. Steinheimer, June D. Coleman, Mark Ewell Ellis, for Defendants.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT STASSINOS'S MOTION TO ABATE AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

On January 9, 2009, this court denied the parties cross motions for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs Richard Carrizosa ("Carrizosa") and Mary Pea's ("Pea") motion for class certification because, although the class satisfied Rule 23's requirements for certification, plaintiffs' proposed class definition was too...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases