1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BERRY v. PETERMAN
 

BERRY v. PETERMAN

Case No. 08-CV-398.

AKIDA BERRY, Plaintiff, v. LT. PETERMAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

February 26, 2010.

ORDER

J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Akida Berry, is proceeding in forma pauperis on claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff was allowed to proceed on claims against Lt. Peterman individually regarding the plaintiff's religious items and Halal diet. He was also allowed to proceed on official capacity claims against Lt. Peterman for: (1) failure to provide the plaintiff with a Halal diet while Kosher meals were available...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases