BRYANT v. GORDON & WONG LAW GROUP, P.C.

No. 2:09-CV-01433-MCE-DAD.

681 F.Supp.2d 1205 (2010)

James BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. GORDON & WONG LAW GROUP, P.C., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

February 1, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd M. Friedman, Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., Beverly Hills, CA, for Plaintiff.

Jeffrey Alan Topor, Tomio B. Narita, Simmonds and Narita LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a Motion by Defendant Gordon & Wong Law Group, P.C. ("Defendant") for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative summary adjudication of issues, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendant so moves on the grounds that claims alleged by Plaintiff James Bryant ("Plaintiff") are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. For the following reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases