CANCER RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY v. BARR LABORATORIES

Civ. No. 07-457-SLR.

679 F.Supp.2d 560 (2010)

CANCER RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 26, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esquire and Rodger D. Smith II, Esquire of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE. Counsel for Plaintiffs. Of Counsel: Jesse J. Jenner, Esquire, Denise L. Loring, Esquire, Christopher J. Harnett, Esquire and Matthew A. Traupman, Esquire of Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY.

John C. Phillips, Esquire and Brian E. Farnan, Esquire of Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A., Wilmington, DE. Counsel for Defendants. Of Counsel: George C. Lombardi, Esquire, Lynn M. Ulrich, Esquire, Ivan M. Poullaos, Esquire, and Julia M. Johnson, Esquire of Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL.


OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action arises out of the filing of an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA")1 by Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, "Barr")2 in 2007 for a generic version of the brain cancer drug Temodar ® (temozolomide3). Plaintiff Cancer Research Technology Limited

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases