VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. v. ONLINENIC, INC.

Case No. C 08-2832 JF (RS).

647 F.Supp.2d 1110 (2009)

VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ONLINENIC, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

July 27, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Jefferson Steele, Newport Beach, CA, Howard Alan Kroll, Pasadena, CA, Sarah B. Deutsch, Verizon Corporation Services Corp., Arlington, VA, for Plaintiffs.


ORDER1 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR CONTEMPT SANCTIONS AND FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

[re: doc. nos. 60 & 113]

JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Verizon California, Inc., Verizon Trademark Services LLC, and Verizon Licensing Company (collectively, "Verizon") move for the imposition of civil contempt sanctions against Defendant OnlineNIC, Inc. ("OnlineNIC") for its alleged violations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases