1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 682 F.Supp.2d
  5. 682 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010)
 

CYTOLOGIC, INC. v. BIOPHERESIS GMBH

Civil Action No. 08-978(CKK).

682 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010)

CYTOLOGIC, INC., and Colorado State University Research Foundation, Plaintiffs, v. BIOPHERESIS GMBH, and Biopheresis Technologies, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 15, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dane Benjamin Jaques, Dombroff Gilmorejaques & French, P.C., McLean, VA, Brad D. Pedersen, Eric H. Chadwick, Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs.

Stephen Eric Baskin, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Cytologic, Inc. and Colorado State University Research Foundation (collectively, "Cytologic"), filed the above-captioned action challenging the actions and decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the United States Patent and Trademark Office pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146. Cytologic named as Defendants Biopheresis GMBH, and Biopheresis Technologies, Inc. (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases