ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES v. INTERN. GAME TECHNOLOGY

No. C-06-03717 RMW.

643 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2009)

ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, Aristocrat Pty. Limited and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY and IGT, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

July 29, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony R. de Alcaeus, Terrence Patrick McMahon, Robert J. Blanch, Jr., for Plaintiff.

Jeffrey Stewart Love, Adam Randal Wichman, Gabriel M. Ramsey, Garth Alan Winn, Kristin L. Cleveland, Lane M. Chitwood, Patrick Marshall Bible, Robert T. Cruzen, Samir N. Pandya, Stephanie Sue Irvine, for Defendants.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT BECAUSE THE "INDICATING" STEP IS NOT PERFORMED

[Re Docket No. 526, 588, 598]

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Defendant International Game Technology ("IGT") moves for summary judgment of non-infringement because, under this court's claim construction, the accused devices do not perform one step of the accused method. Plaintiff Aristocrat Technologies, et al. (collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases