HAMMA v. INTEL CORP.

No. 2:07-cv-01795-GEB-CMK.

642 F.Supp.2d 1144 (2009)

Denise K. HAMMA, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION; Intel Corporation Long Term; Disability Benefit Plan; Intel Disability Appeals Committee; and Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

March 23, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Nicholas Darras, Shernoff Bidart Darras Echeverria LLP, Ontario, CA, Pamela I. Atkins, Atkins and Associates, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff.

Joseph E. Lambert, Joseph Lambert PC, Attorney at Law, Mesa, AZ, Nancy Joan Sheehan, Porter Scott, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants.


ORDER

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., District Judge.

Defendants Intel Corporation, Intel Corporation Long Term Disability Plan, Intel Disability Appeals Committee (collectively "Intel"), and Matrix Absence Management ("Matrix") seek summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(b) ("ERISA") for long term disability ("LTD") benefits. Plaintiff opposes the motion and requests in her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases