1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 662 F.Supp.2d
  5. 662 F.Supp.2d 1356 (2009)
 

THYSSENKRUPP MEXINOX S.A. DE C.V. v. U.S.

Slip. Op. 09-138. Court No. 06-00236.

662 F.Supp.2d 1356 (2009)

THYSSENKRUPP MEXINOX S.A. DE C.V. et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendant, Ak Steel Corporation, Allegheny Ludlum Corporation and North American Stainless, Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

December 15, 2009.

JUDGMENT

POGUE, Judge.

This action involves the distribution to affected domestic producers, pursuant to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 ("CDSOA" or "Byrd Amendment"), section 754 of the Tariff Act, 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000), of antidumping ("AD") duties assessed and collected on imports of certain steel products from Mexico. In their complaint, Plaintiffs claimed, correctly, that the Byrd Amendment may not be applied to AD...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases