SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO.

Civil Action No. 09-cv-560 (DMC).

657 F.Supp.2d 525 (2009)

SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP., Plaintiff, v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO., Defendant, Otis Elevator Co., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. Schindler Elevator Corp. and Schindler Aufzüge AG, Counterclaim Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 24, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey James Brosemer, Brosemer Kolefas & Associates, Hazlet, NJ, Pierre R. Yanney, Thomas J. Bean, Darby & Darby, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

Donald A. Robinson, Keith J. Miller, Leda Dunn Wettre, Robinson, Wettre & Miller LLC, Newark, NJ, for Defendant.


OPINION

FALK, United States Magistrate Judge.

The issue to be decided is whether a party seeking to take a deposition of a Swiss corporate defendant must comply with the Hague Convention or may it simply follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Otis Elevator ("Otis") noticed a deposition of Counterclaim Defendant Schindler Aufzüge AG ("Schindler Aufzüge"), a Swiss corporation, in accordance with the Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases