1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 615 F.Supp.2d
  5. 615 F.Supp.2d 248 (2009)
 

STAUFFER v. BROOKS BROS., INC.

No. 08-cv-10369 (SHS).

615 F.Supp.2d 248 (2009)

Raymond E. STAUFFER, Plaintiff, v. BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. and Retail Brand Alliance, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 14, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond E. Stauffer, Chatham, NJ, pro se.

Jura Christine Zibas, Joanne Jennifer Romero, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New York, NY, Neil Bryan Friedman, Linda Kurth, Ryan Andrew McGonigle, Baker and Rannells P.A., Raritan, NJ, for Defendants.

OPINION & ORDER

SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Raymond E. Stauffer brings this qui tam action against Brooks Brothers, Inc. and its parent company, Retail Brand Alliance, Inc. (collectively, "Brooks Brothers") alleging false patent marking in violation of section 292 of the Patent Act. 35 U.S.C. § 292. That section prohibits a person from marking an "unpatented article" with words "importing that the same is patented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases