1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 654 F.Supp.2d
  5. 654 F.Supp.2d 973 (2009)
 

LUIKEN v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, LLC

Civil No. 09-516 (DWF/AJB).

654 F.Supp.2d 973 (2009)

Matt LUIKEN and Jon Sandquist, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 Class, Plaintiffs, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

August 3, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Michelle Drake, Esq., and Paul J. Lukas, Esq., Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs.

Juli Ann Lund, Esq., and Philip A. Sechler, Esq., Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, and Tracey Holmes Donesky, Esq., Leonard, Street and Deinard, PA, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss brought by Defendant Domino's Pizza, LLC ("Domino's"). In their Complaint, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and a purported nationwide collective of Domino's delivery drivers and a putative Rule 23 class of Minnesota drivers (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), primarily assert that Domino's failure to adequately reimburse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases