1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 633 F.Supp.2d
  5. 633 F.Supp.2d 931 (2009)
 

SEIKO EPSON CORP. v. CORETRONIC CORP.

No. C 06-06946 MHP.

633 F.Supp.2d 931 (2009)

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. CORETRONIC CORPORATION and Optoma Technology, Inc., Defendants/Counter-Claimants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 15, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan Gregory Van Keulen, Christopher Lee Ogden, Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP, San Jose, CA, James A. Oliff, John W. O'Meara, Tamir D. Damari, William J. Utermohlen, Oliff & Berridge PLC, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff.

Elizabeth H. Rader, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

OPINION

Re: Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of Invalidity

MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff/counter-defendant Seiko Epson Corporation ("Seiko Epson") brought this action against defendant/counter-claimant Coretronic Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. (collectively "Coretronic"), alleging infringement of several United States patents, including U.S. Patent No. 6,203,158 ("the '158 patent") and U.S. Patent No. 6,527,392...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases