SHUM v. INTEL CORP.

No. C-02-3262-DLJ.

630 F.Supp.2d 1063 (2009)

Frank T. SHUM, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 29, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Robert Wallach, Law Offices of E. Robert Bob Wallach, Paul F. Kirsch, Angus M. MacDonald, Mark T. Jansen, Robert Allan McFarlane, Tali Leah N. Alban, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, Christofer Charles Nolan, Carlson Calladine & Peterson LLP, San Francisco, CA, Alan L. Barry, Bell, Boyd & Lloyd, Chicago, IL, Harris Zimmerman, Law Offices Of Harris Zimmerman, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff.

Robert Addy Vannest, Daniel E. Jackson, Daniel Edward Purcell, Keker & Van Nest, Stephen E. Taylor, Jayesh Sanatkumar Hines-Shah, Jessica L. Grant, Jonathan Alan Patchen, Stephen McGeorge Bundy, Taylor & Company Law Offices, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.


ORDER

D. LOWELL JENSEN, District Judge.

On February 20, 2009, the Court heard oral argument on Defendants' renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). Having considered the papers submitted, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' renewed motion for JMOL as to Shum's state law claims, and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' renewed motion for JMOL as to inventorship.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases