1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 606 F.Supp.2d
  5. 606 F.Supp.2d 1308 (2009)
 

U.S. v. WILGUS

Case Nos. 2:99-CR-00047, 2:99-CR-00166, 2:00-CR-00029.

606 F.Supp.2d 1308 (2009)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Samuel Ray WILGUS, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.

February 17, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard N. Lambert, U.S. Attorneys, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Joseph F. Orifici, Holladay, UT, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

DEE BENSON, District Judge.

In 1990 the United States Supreme Court held that an otherwise valid law of general application that incidentally imposed a burden on the practice of a particular religion did not offend the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. See Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 110 S.Ct. 1595, 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990). Characterizing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases