INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
IBM; IBM Corporation; IBM Personal Computing Division; Lenovo (United States) Inc.; Lenovo Group Ltd.; UPEK, Inc.; and John Does 1-20, Defendants and Counterclaimants.
United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 12, 2009.
January 12, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
J. David Nelson, Robert D. Dahle, Nelson Snuffer Dahle & Poulsen, Sandy, UT, Max D. Wheeler, P. Matthew Cox, Snow Christensen & Martineau, Salt Lake City, UT, Bryan A. Kohm, Fenwick & West, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey A. Miller, Sugithra Somasekar, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Menlo Park, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Edwin H. Taylor, Lester J. Vincent, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Sunnyvale, CA, Bryan A. Kohm, Darryl M. Woo, Heather N. Mewes, Ryan J. Marton, Bryan A. Kohm, Fenwick & West, San Francisco, CA, Gerald Chan, James G. Snell, Bingham McCutchen LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, Jeffrey A. Miller, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Sugithra Somasekar, Menlo Park, CA, Joseph R. Bond, Heber City, UT, Jared S. Goff, Goff Patent Law, John D. Vandenberg, Stephanie S. Irvine, Portland, OR, James S. Jardine, Rick B. Hoggard, Samuel C. Straight, Ray Quinney & Nebeker, Todd M. Shaughnessy, Snell & Wilmer, Larry R. Laycock, Robyn L. Phillips, Workman Nydegger, Max D. Wheeler, P. Matthew Cox, Joseph P. Barrett, Snow Christensen & Martineau, Salt Lake City, UT, J. David Nelson, Robert D. Dahle, Nelson Snuffer Dahle & Poulsen, Sandy, UT, Isabella Fu, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Mitchell S. Feller, Morris Waisbrot, William Francis Haigney, Hogan & Hartson, Richard S. Taffet, Bingham McCutchen LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
DEE BENSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 28, 1997, after several unsuccessful attempts, the U.S. Patent Office finally granted inventor Neldon Johnson U.S. Patent No. 5,598,474 (the '474 patent) which allowed Johnson to enter the already crowded field of automatic fingerprint identification. Not surprisingly, Johnson's patent described an apparatus capable of reading a fingerprint, identifying...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
