1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 584 F.Supp.2d
  5. 584 F.Supp.2d 824 (2008)
 

NATIONAL ASS'N FOR STOCK CAR AUTO RACING v. DOES

No. 3:08-cv-00044-FDW.

584 F.Supp.2d 824 (2008)

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STOCK CAR AUTO RACING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Various John and Jane DOES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

November 6, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rodrick J. Enns, Enns & Archer, LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, for Plaintiffs.

Frank Parsons, Columbia, OH, pro se.

Edward A. Brandt, Warminster, PA, pro se.

Paul J. Vanrisseghem, Cincinnati, OH, pro se.

Ceasar Vasquez, Staten Island, NY, pro se.

Percy Richard, Gary, IN, pro se.

Steven Nezdosky, Arverne, NY, pro se.

Alan Krigger, North Hills, CA, pro se.

Kevin McCormick, Levittown, NY, pro se.

Jonathan RSI Maxwell, Lacrosse, FL, pro se.

Laura Kleinberg, Lancaster, CA, pro se.

Devonte Walls, Hollywood, CA, pro se.

Jasumt Patel, Alachua, FL, pro se.

Jay Govinda, Tucker, GA, pro se.

Kevin McNary, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Rickie Lyn Berry, Fresno, CA, pro se.

Patrick Quaranto, Bethpage, NY, pro se.

Richard William Spertzel, Saint Paris, OH, pro se.

James David Flahavin, Cocoa Beach, FL, pro se.

Jonathan William Savage, Columbia, SC, pro se.

Kenneth Youmans, Columbia, SC, pro se.

Lacey Green, Hopkins, SC, pro se.

William Shearin, Jr., Philadelphia, PA, pro se.

Kenneth Wayne Johnson, Atlanta, GA, pro se.

Jamak Williams, Columbia, SC, pro se.

Thomas M. Wood, Newbury, VT, pro se.

Thomas Bart Gibson, Pittsburgh, PA, pro se.

Kenneth Yoomans, Hopkins, SC, pro se.

Belinda Archie, Eastover, SC, pro se.

Eric Herzog, Port St. Lucie, FL, pro se.

Caesar Silva, Aurora, IL, pro se.

John Clark, Laurel, OR, pro se.

ORDER

FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes now before the Court sua sponte to address the standards and procedures for the disposition of counterfeit goods seized pursuant to the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984 ("The Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 1116-1118.

BACKGROUND

This is an action for a violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases