1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 580 F.Supp.2d
  5. 580 F.Supp.2d 797 (2008)
 

HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. GOOGLE, INC.

No. 06-cv-199-bbc.

580 F.Supp.2d 797 (2008)

HYPERPHRASE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and Hyperphrase, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

September 30, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennifer L. Amundsen, Kim Grimmer, Solheim Billing & Grimmer, Madison, WI, Raymond P. Niro, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

James Donald Peterson, Hannah L. Renfro, James Alan Friedman, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Madison, WI, Jason William Wolff, Fish & Richardson, San Diego, CA, Frank E. Scherkenbach, Boston, MA, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Hyperphrase Technologies, LLC and Hyperphrase, Inc. brought this patent infringement action alleging that defendant Google Inc.'s AutoLink and AdSense products infringe plaintiffs' United States Patents Nos. 5,903,889, ('889 patent) 6,434,567 ('567 patent), 6,526,321 ('321 patent) and 7,013,298 ('298 patent). On December 20, 2006, Judge Shabaz granted summary judgment to defendant, finding that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases