CROSMAN CORPORATION v. HECKLER & KOCH, INC.

08-CV-6034 (CJS)

CROSMAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HECKLER & KOCH, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

September 16, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For Plaintiff: Jerauld E. Brydges, Esq. Stephen B. Salai, Esq. Harter, Secrest and Emery, LLP Bausch & Lomb Place Rochester, New York.

For Defendants: Heidi Schenk Martinez, Esq. Thomas E. Reidy, Esq. Ward, Norris, Heller & Reidy, LLP State Street, Rochester, New York.

Sean J. Kirby, Esq. Theodore C. Max, Esq. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York.


DECISION AND ORDER

CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this action, Plaintiff Crosman Corporation ("Plaintiff"), a manufacturer of air guns, seeks a declaratory judgment that its Pulse R74 Electric Soft Air Rifle does not infringe the intellectual property rights of Defendant Heckler & Koch, Inc. ("Defendant"). Now before the Court is Defendant's motion [#20] captioned, "Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(4), 12...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases