NAT'L LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. SIREN RETAIL CORP.

No. 22-1969.

99 F.4th 1118 (2024)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SIREN RETAIL CORPORATION dba Starbucks, Respondent, Workers United, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 24, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Hickson (argued), Senior Attorney; Elizabeth A. Heaney , Supervisory Attorney; David Habenstreit , Assistant General Counsel; Ruth E. Burdick , Deputy Associate General Counsel; Peter S. Ohr , Deputy General Counsel; Jennifer A. Abruzzo , General Counsel; National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.; for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board.

Benjamin Berger (argued) and Dmitri Iglitzin , Barnard Iglitzin & Lavitt LLP, Seattle, WA, for Intervenor Workers United.

Gregory S. Fisher (argued), Littler Mendelson PC, Anchorage, Alaska; Ryan P. Hammond , Littler Mendelson PC, Seattle, Washington; Maury Baskin and Stefan Marculewicz , Littler Mendelson PC, Washington, D.C.; for Respondent Siren Retail Corporation dba Starbucks.

Before: M. Margaret McKeown, N. Randy Smith, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Starbucks's strained relationship with its unionized workers has been much in the news over the past few years. This case, which concerns a prolonged battle over the union election at the first Starbucks Reserve Roastery in Seattle, is no exception.

In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases