1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LYTLE v. NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, INC.
 

LYTLE v. NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, INC.

No. 22-55744.

JUSTIN LYTLE and CHRISTINE MUSTHALER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, INC. AND NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES VETERINARY SCIENCES, INC, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 22, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David R. Carpenter (argued), Sean A. Commons , Nicole M. Baade , and Amy P. Lally , Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, California; Joshua A. Glikin , Bowie & Jensen LLC, Townson, Maryland; for Defendants-Appellants.

Mark R. Sigmon (argued), Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Greg F. Coleman and Adam A. Edwards , Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC, Knoxville, Tennessee; Michael H. Pearson , and Daniel L. Warshaw , Pearson Simon & Warshaw LLP, Sherman Oaks, California; Matthew D. Schultz , Levin Papantonio Rafferty Proctor Buchanan O'Brien Barr & Mougey PA, Pensacola, Florida; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Opinion by Judge Rakoff.

OPINION

This is a putative consumer class action concerning the marketing of the pet health product Cosequin. Plaintiffs-Appellees claim that Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, Inc. (collectively, "Nutramax") violated the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"), Cal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases