1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP v. ROSETTE
 

WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP v. ROSETTE

No. 23-55166.

WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHARON ROSETTE; ROSETTE & ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP, Defendants-Appellees, and QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION; ROBERT ROSETTE; RICHARD ARMSTRONG; KEENY ESCALANTI, Sr.; MARK WILLIAM WHITE II; DOES, 1 through 10, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed April 17, 2024.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiff Williams & Cochrane ("W&C") appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants Rosette on W&C's claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The district court concluded that "[b]ecause W&C has no evidence that the Pauma Sentence influenced the Quechan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases