UNITED STATES v. WHIPPLE

No. 23-5126.

92 F.4th 605 (2024)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Zenas WHIPPLE, III, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: February 8, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Joshua D. Hedrick , WHITT, COOPER, HEDRICK & WOJCIK, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Samuel R. Fitzpatrick , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Joshua D. Hedrick , WHITT, COOPER, HEDRICK & WOJCIK, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellant. Samuel R. Fitzpatrick , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Appellee.

Before: BATCHELDER, CLAY, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Robert Whipple appeals the denial of his motions to suppress evidence. Whipple argued that law enforcement violated his Fourth Amendment rights when officers subpoenaed Walmart for his purchase history, searched his phone after the expiration of the warrant for his phone, and impermissibly seized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases