No. 22-15959.

92 F.4th 833 (2024)

Tayo E. DARAMOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, on its own behalf and through its wholly owned subsidiaries NetSuite Inc., and Oracle Canada; Pat Merell; Mita Patniak; James Bork; Dionis Gauvin; Doug Harris; Doug Riseberg, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 6, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary E. Schultz (argued), Mary Schultz Law PS, Spangle, Washington, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Sarah E. Bouchard (argued) and Eric C. Kim , Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Morgan Christen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.


We are asked to decide whether the whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions in the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts apply outside the United States, and, if not, whether this case involves a permissible domestic application of the statutes. Our answer to both questions is no. We therefore affirm the dismissal of the plaintiff...

Let's get started


Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases