Damon LANDOR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND PUBLIC SAFETY; James M. LeBlanc, in his official capacity as Secretary thereof, and individually; Raymond Laborde Correctional Center; Marcus Myers, in his official capacity as Warden thereof, and individually; John Does 1-10; ABC Entities 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
FILED February 5, 2024.
FILED February 5, 2024.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Zachary Tripp , Weil, Gotshal & Manges, L.L.P., Washington, DC, Shai Berman , Weil, Gotshal & Manges, L.L.P., New York, NY, Casey Rose Denson , Casey Denson Law, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Gordon D. Todd, Attorney, Sidley Austin, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America.
Adeel A. Mangi, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae 19 Religious Organizations.
Joshua C. McDaniel, Attorney, Harvard Law School, Religious Freedom Clinic, Cambridge, MA, for Amicus Curiae Professor Douglas Laycock.
Noel John Francisco, Jacob Moshe Roth, Jones Day, Washington, DC, Eric C. Rassbach, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Proffessor Byron Johnson.
Adeel A. Mangi, Jacob Isaac Chefitz, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae 35 Religious Organizations.
Clifford Warren Berlow, Jenner & Block, L.L.P., Chicago, IL, for Amicus Curiae Agudath Israel of America.
Francesca Genova Matozzo, Religious Liberty Clinic, Notre Dame, IN, for Amici Curiae Bruderhof, Creating Law Enforcement Accountability and Responsibility, Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty, Sikh Coalition.
Before Clement, Graves, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
Per Curiam:
Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing (5TH CIR. R. 35 I.O.P.), the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED because, at the request of one of its members, the court was polled, and a majority did not vote in favor...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
