ROKU, INC. v. INTERN. TRADE COM'N

2022-1386.

90 F.4th 1367 (2024)

ROKU, INC., Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, Universal Electronics, Inc., Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: January 19, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Hallward-Driemeier , Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Brendan Frederick McLaughlin , Matthew Rizzolo ; Michael Morales , Matthew R. Shapiro , New York, NY; Andrew N. Thomases , East Palo Alto, CA; Jonathan Daniel Baker , Dickinson Wright RLLP, Mountain View, CA; Michael David Saunders , Austin, TX.

Matthew S. Stevens , Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Kirk T. Bradley , Nicholas Christopher Marais ; Thomas W. Davison , Adam Swain , Washington, DC, Ryan W. Koppelman , Los Angeles, CA.

Carl Paul Bretscher , Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Wayne W. Herrington , Sidney A. Rosenzweig .

Before Dyk, Hughes, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.


Appellant Roku, Inc. appeals a final determination from the International Trade Commission, finding that (1) Intervenor Universal Electronics, Inc. had ownership rights to assert U.S. Patent No. 10,593,196 in the investigation; (2) Universal satisfied the economic prong of the domestic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases