1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 90 F.4th
  5. 90 F.4th 871 (2024)
 

BRANDENBURG TEL. v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.

No. 23-5369.

90 F.4th 871 (2024)

BRANDENBURG TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: January 10, 2024.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Edward T. Depp , DINSMORE & SHOHL, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Philip D. Williamson , TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Edward T. Depp , John E. Selent , R. Brooks Herrick , Anne Stewart Myers , DINSMORE & SHOHL, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Philip D. Williamson , Annie M. McClellan , TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, Philip R. Schenkenberg , TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Appellee.

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; STRANCH and MATHIS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

After more than a decade of regulatory and judicial proceedings, Sprint Communications concedes that it failed to pay Brandenburg Telephone Company in full for connecting local telephone calls and now owes $2.2 million plus compound interest. This appeal concerns one residual question: the interest rate on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases