1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 88 F.4th
  5. 88 F.4th 969 (2023)
 

PARKERVISION, INC. v. VIDAL

2022-1548.

88 F.4th 969 (2023)

PARKERVISION, INC., Appellant v. Katherine K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: December 15, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jason Scott Charkow , Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Ronald Marc Daignault , Chandran Iyer , Richard Juang.

Michael S. Forman , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Benjamin T. Hickman , Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.

Before Prost, Wallach, and Chen, Circuit Judges.

Intel Corporation petitioned the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) for inter partes review (IPR) of independent claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444 ('444 patent), owned by ParkerVision, Inc. The Board determined that claim 3 is unpatentable as obvious, and ParkerVision appeals. Because the Board correctly construed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases