1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 87 F.4th
  5. 87 F.4th 487 (2023)
 

PONZIO v. PINON

No. 21-14503.

87 F.4th 487 (2023)

Robert PONZIO, Alex Acuna, Brian Madsen, Vanessa M. Montgomery, Robert Mull, Hadiya Nelthrope, Samuel Salgado, Frederick J. Parker, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Interested Parties-Appellants, v. Emily PINON, Gary C. Klein, Kim Brown, Joshua Frankum, Todd Bryan, Dinez Webster, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Daimler AG, Mercedes Benz USA, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Filed: November 27, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Cecchi , Caroline F. Bartlett , James O'Brien , Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & Agnello, PC, Roseland, NJ, Steven G. Calamusa , Robert E. Gordon , Daniel G. Williams , Gordon & Partners, PA, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, Michael A. Caplan , Timothy Brandon Waddell , Caplan Cobb, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Alexander Charles Cohen , Mark Dearman , Maxwell H. Sawyer , Douglas Wilens , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP, Boca Raton, FL, for Interested Parties-Appellants.

Taylor Bartlett , William Lewis Garrison, Jr. , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Birmingham, AL, K. Stephen Jackson , Jackson & Tucker, PC, Birmingham, AL, Travis Edward Lynch , Jonathan R. Miller , Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, Atlanta, GA, James F. McDonough, III , Rozier Hardt McDonough, PLLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Scott Jefferson Carr , Eric Jonathan Knapp , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, San Francisco, CA, Stephen B. Devereaux , Madison Kitchens , Adam Reinke , John Franklin Sacha, Jr. , King & Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Dara D. Mann , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Atlanta, GA, Troy Masami Yoshino , Winston & Strawn, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Thomas M. Sobol , Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Boston, MA, for Amicus Curiae Professor Simona Grossi.

Before Jordan, Newsom, and Ed Carnes, Circuit Judges.

In this class action case, objectors to a proposed settlement agreement claimed that it left 80% of the class members without any benefits whatsoever. The district court took the allegation seriously, addressed it at the fairness hearing, and ultimately rejected it as meritless. We come to the same conclusion and hold that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases