KIVITI v. BHATT

No. 22-1216.

80 F.4th 520 (2023)

Roee KIVITI; Adiel Kiviti, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Naveen Prasad BHATT, Debtor-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: September 14, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice Belmont VerStandig , THE VERSTANDIG LAW FIRM, LLC, Henderson, Nevada, for Appellants. Justin Philip Fasano , MCNAMEE HOSEA, P.A., Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge Richardson wrote the opinion, in which Judge Rushing and Senior Judge Motz joined.


We must police Congress's limits on judicial review, even when both parties would rather we not. Adiel and Roee Kiviti paid Naveen Bhatt to renovate their Washington, D.C. home. But he wasn't properly licensed. So, according to D.C. law, there was a chance he owed them their money back. Rather than pay, he invoked the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases