IN RE: MUNICIPAL STORMWATER POND COORDINATED LITIGATION.
City of Burnsville, Minnesota; City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota; City of Maple Grove, Minnesota; City of White Bear Lake, Minnesota; City of Minnetonka, Minnesota; City of Bloomington, Minnesota; City of Golden Valley, Minnesota; City of Eagan, Minnesota; City of Apple Valley, Minnesota; City of Saint Cloud, Minnesota; City of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Koppers, Inc.; Ruetgers Canada, Inc., now known as Rain Carbon Canada Inc; Stella-Jones Corp.; Coopers Creek Chemical Corporation; Lone Star Specialty Products, LLC; Beazer East, Defendants-Appellees,
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee/cross appellant Coopers Creek Chemical Corporation and appeared on the appellees/cross appellants brief of Coopers Creek Chemical Corporation and Lone Star Specialty Products, LLC, was Andrew William Davis , of Minneapolis, MN. The following attorney(s) also appeared on the appellees/cross appellants' brief; Claire M. Williams , of Minneapolis, MN., Robert L. Graff , of Minneapolis, MN., Julia J. Nierengarten , of Minneapolis, MN., Joel M. Muscoplat , of Minneapolis, MN.
Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellees/cross appellants Beazer East and Koppers, Inc. and appeared on the appellees/cross appellants' brief, was Michael C. McCarthy , of Minneapolis, MN. The following attorney(s) also appeared on the appellees/cross appellants' brief of Koppers, Inc. and Ruetgers Canada, Inc., now known as Rain Carbon Canada, Inc. and the appellee/cross appellant brief of Beazer East; Erica Holzer , of Minneapolis, MN., Robert L. Shuftan , of Chicago, IL., Jevon C. Bindman , of Minneapolis, MN., Tami Lyn Azorsky , of Washington, DC., Christina M. Carroll , of Washington, DC., Wade P.K. Carr , of North Kansas City, MO., Mark Jacobson , of Minneapolis, MN.
Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.
Several cities in Minnesota allege that a chemical in refined coal tar that was used in pavement sealants contaminated their stormwater ponds. They filed an action seeking damages from refiners and manufacturers of the tar. The "refiner" defendants take raw coal tar and refine it...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
