PATEL v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. 22-55294.

72 F.4th 1103 (2023)

Nanubhai M. PATEL; Lalitaben N. Patel; Vimal Nanu Patel; Vimal, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation; Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department; Does, 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 11, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank A. Weiser , Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Amber A. Logan , Logan Mathevosian & Hur LLP, Los Angeles, California; Michael M. Walsh , Deputy City Attorney; Scott Marcus , Chief Assistant City Attorney; Hydee Feldstein Soto , City Attorney; Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney; Los Angeles, California; Henry P. Nelson , Nelson & Fulton, Los Angeles, California; for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Susan P. Graber and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges, and John R. Tunheim, District Judge.


OPINION

Plaintiffs Nanubhai M. Patel, Lalitaben N. Patel, Vimal Nanu Patel, and Vimal, Inc., timely appeal from the district court's dismissal of their first amended complaint for failure to state a claim. After the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (the "Sheriff's Department") seized $98,000 from Plaintiffs pursuant to a state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases