MEDYTOX, INC. v. GALDERMA S.A.

2022-1165.

71 F.4th 990 (2023)

MEDYTOX, INC., Appellant, v. GALDERMA S.A., Galderma Laboratories Inc., Galderma Laboratories, L.P., Galderma Research and Development, S.N.C., SHDS, Inc., Galderma Holdings S.A., Appellees. Katherine K. Vidal, under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: June 27, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vishal C. Gupta , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by Tyler Doh , John J. Molenda ; Christopher Alan Suarez , Washington, DC.

Joseph A. Mahoney , Mayer Brown, LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for appellees. Also represented by Amanda Streff Bonner , Erick J. Palmer , Chicago, IL.

Robert McBride , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Sarah E. Craven , Thomas W. Krause , Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed .

Before Dyk, Reyna, and Stark, Circuit Judges.


Appellant Medytox, Inc. appeals a final written decision in a post-grant review proceeding of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that denied Medytox's revised motion to amend to substitute claims 19-27 of U.S. Patent No. 10,143,728. On appeal, Medytox challenges the Board's findings on

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases