1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 70 F.4th
  5. 70 F.4th 441 (2023)
 

PAR v. WOLFE CLINIC, P.C.

No. 22-2286.

70 F.4th 441 (2023)

George PAR; IVYR, PLLC, doing business as Par Retina, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. WOLFE CLINIC, P.C.; Jared S. Nielsen; Kyle J. Alliman; David D. Saggau, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: June 5, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant and appeared on the brief was Carl Stanley Burkhalter , of Birmingham, AL. The following attorneys also appeared on the appellant brief; Angel A. West , of Johnston, IA., and Thomas Clinton Goodhue , of Johnston, IA.

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee and appeared on the brief was Peter Joseph Schwingler , of Minneapolis, MN. The following attorneys also appeared on the appellee brief; Mark E. Weinhardt , of Des Moines, IA., Danielle M. Shelton , of Des Moines, IA., and Andrew P. Leiendecker , of Minneapolis, MN.

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Dr. George J. Par (and IVYR PLLC, doing business as Par Retina) sued Wolfe Clinic, P.C. (and three of its owner-physicians). Par alleged that the Clinic monopolized or attempted to monopolize the vitreoretinal care market. On the merits, the district court1 initially dismissed the monopolization...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases