1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 53 F.4th
  5. 53 F.4th 665 (2022)
 

IN RE CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

No. 21-1270.

53 F.4th 665 (2022)

IN RE: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, Petitioners FMC Corporation and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided November 22, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephanie M. Parent argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the petition for writ of mandamus and the reply was Jonathan C. Evans .

Kamela A. Caschette , Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the opposition to the petition for writ of mandamus were Todd Kim , Assistant Attorney General, and Patrick R. Jacobi , Attorney.

Thomas A. Lorenzen argued the cause for intervenors. With him on the response to the petition for writ of mandamus were Kirsten L. Nathanson and Elizabeth B. Dawson . Amanda S. Berman entered an appearance.

Before: Millett and Rao, Circuit Judges, and Tatel, Senior Circuit Judge.

Eight years ago, the Environmental Protection Agency registered a new pesticide without first determining, as required by the Endangered Species Act, whether it would have an adverse effect on endangered species. Then, five years ago, our court ordered EPA to fulfill that statutory obligation. Notwithstanding Congress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases