PADILLA v. SMITH

No. 20-13469.

53 F.4th 1303 (2022)

Carlos PADILLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vincenta Bonet SMITH, Bonet & Smith, PC Interested Parties-Appellees, Redmont Properties LLC, Redmont Properties EG LLC, Redmont Properties of Homewood LLC, Fred G. Nunnelly, III, RM Management, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Filed: November 18, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jason Lamar Yearout , Sigfredo Rubio , Rubio Law Firm, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gordon L. Blair , David Lynn Warren, Jr. , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Vincenta Bonet Smith, Birmingham, AL, Pro Se.

James L. Spinks , Spinks Law Group, Birmingham, AL, for Interested Party-Appellee Bonet & Smith, PC.

Before Rosenbaum, Tjoflat, Circuit Judges, and Steele, District Judge.


The controversy in this case is rooted in the propriety of a lawyer charging a wage earner a contingent attorney's fee for prosecuting the wage earner's Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") claims in a U.S. District Court. The wage earner paid the contingent fee and then sued his lawyer in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases