51 F.4th 1377 (2022)

FINJAN LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESET, LLC, ESET spol. s.r.o., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 1, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Juanita Rose Brooks , Fish & Richardson P.C., San Diego, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Jason W. Wolff ; Robert Courtney , Minneapolis, MN.

Nicola Anthony Pisano , Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Justin Edwin Gray , Jose L. Patino , Scott Penner , Regis Calvin Worley, Jr.

Before Prost, Reyna, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Finjan, Inc. appeals the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California's grant of summary judgment of invalidity. The district court construed the claim term "Downloadable" in the asserted patents to be restricted to "small" executable or interpretable application programs

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases