1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. TREND MICRO INC. v. CUPP COMPUTING AS
 

TREND MICRO INC. v. CUPP COMPUTING AS

Nos. 2020-2237, 2020-2238.

TREND MICRO INC., Appellant, v. CUPP COMPUTING AS, Appellee, KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: October 25, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III , DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT BUERGI , MARK D. FOWLER , East Palo Alto, CA.

JAMES R. HANNAH , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE ; CRISTINA MARTINEZ , JEFFREY PRICE , New York, NY.

BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN , THOMAS W. KRAUSE , FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

Before DYK, TARANTO, and STARK, Circuit Judges.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Trend Micro Inc. filed petitions in the Patent and Trademark Office seeking inter partes reviews (IPRs) under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-19 of certain claims of two patents owned by CUPP Computing AS—claims 1, 7, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 8,365,272 and claims 1,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases