1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 46 F.4th
  5. 46 F.4th 1124 (2022)
 

MANRIQUEZ v. ENSLEY

No. 20-16917.

46 F.4th 1124 (2022)

Richard MANRIQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel Christian ENSLEY; Bryan Lawrence, Defendants-Appellants, and Town of Superior, a political subdivision; Richard H. Mueller; Anthony Doran, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 30, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Jellison (argued), Jellison Law Offices PLLC, Carefree, Arizona, for Defendants-Appellants.

Martin A. Bihn (argued) and Donna M. McDaniel , Bihn & McDaniel PLC, Phoenix, Arizona, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Otake.

OPINION

The Fourth Amendment specifically requires a warrant to include a description of the "place to be searched." The police officers here—at first—complied with that requirement, obtaining a warrant that listed a motel room suspected of being a hub for drug trafficking. The officers then decided

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases