POTTER v. COZEN & O'CONNOR

No. 21-2258.

46 F.4th 148 (2022)

Adam POTTER; Moxie HC LLC, Appellants v. COZEN & O'CONNOR; Anne Blume, Esquire; Anne M. Madonia, Esquire.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Opinion Filed: August 24, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford E. Haines , Haines & Associates, 1339 Chestnut Street, The Widener Building, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Attorney for Adam Potter and Moxie HC LLC.

Brian P. Flaherty , Cozen & O'Connor, 1650 Market Street, One Liberty Place, Suite 2800, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Attorney for Cozen & O'Connor, Anne Blume, Esquire, and Anne Madonia, Esquire.

Before: JORDAN, KRAUSE, and PORTER, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

A plaintiff who seeks to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal courts must meet the standing requirements of Article III of the United States Constitution. But courts have also attached the label of "standing doctrine" to various "equitable" or "prudential" limitations they have imposed on a plaintiff's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases