CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES LP v. INGENIO, INC.

2022-1016.

45 F.4th 1363 (2022)

CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES LP, Plaintiff-Appellant v. INGENIO, INC., DBA Keen, Ether, Thryv, Inc., Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: August 17, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Shih , Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Brian Melton , Max Lalon Tribble, Jr. , Houston, TX.

Amanda N. Brouillette , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by David Clay Holloway , Mitchell G. Stockwell .

Before Stoll, Schall, and Cunningham, Circuit Judges.


This appeal involves the district court patent-infringement suit that is the sister case to the inter partes review considered by the Supreme Court in Thryv, Inc v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 1367, 206 L.Ed.2d 554 (2020). Significant to this case, despite Ingenio seeking IPR of all of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases