1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.4th
  4. 44 F.4th
  5. 44 F.4th 1358 (2022)
 

HOLOGIC, INC. v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC.

2019-2054, 2019-2081.

44 F.4th 1358 (2022)

HOLOGIC, INC., Cytyc Surgical Products, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: August 11, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Wolf , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by Marc A. Cohn , Jennifer Sklenar .

Robert N. Hochman , Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by Caroline A. Wong ; Jillian Stonecipher , Washington, DC; Vera Elson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA; Olivia M. Kim , Edward Poplawski , Los Angeles, CA.

Before Stoll, Clevenger, and Wallach, Circuit Judges.

This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court. The Court vacated our judgment affirming the district court's summary judgment of no invalidity for claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 9,095,348 in favor of Hologic, Inc. and Cytyc Surgical Products, LLC (collectively, "Hologic") based on the doctrine of assignor estoppel. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases